Barack Hussein Obama continues to beat the American people over the head with the focus-group tested terms "compromise" and "balanced approach" regarding our nation's spending crisis. After all, what could be more reasonable than compromise? What could be more fair than "balance?"
And while many well-intended idiots (including plenty in the media) will swallow that reasoning hook, line, and sinker, Hope n' Change has posed the little thought experiment above in hopes of getting people to realize that "compromising" to commit half of a great evil is still a great evil.
Would just 3 million Jews in Germany's ovens have been no big deal? If the Oslo shooter only killed half as many victims, should we shrug it off and say "that seems fair"? If only one World Trade Center tower crashed into the streets of New York, would it have failed to make the nightly news? Would lynch mobs who hang only 50% of blacks, latinos, gays, Muslims, Christians, or corporate jet owners be acting in the highest and most noble traditions of our forefathers?
Of course not. The idea is an obscenity.
Which is why it's so appalling to hear Obama - the alleged master of language - use terms like "balance" and "compromise" for such perverse ends. Seriously, this president uses words the way a pederast uses children...debasing them for his personal pleasure.
If an Obama-style "compromise" or "balanced approach" is ultimately agreed upon by the Republicans, then God help our republic.
Because we'll be more than halfway to Hell.
An optimist sees the grave as half-empty. A pessimist sees it as half-full.
But a compromiser sees it as "just right."
-
0 comments:
Post a Comment